- Schedule your Consultation
Swimming Pool Accidents Lawyer
- Home /
- Swimming Pool Accidents Lawyer
Due to the extended season during which they are operational, swimming pools in Texas are a significant source of amusement. Nonetheless, both pool ownership and pool use are accompanied by inherent dangers. Particularly among minors, drowning is a leading cause of death. A case involving "Premise Liability" rather than "strict negligence" is more likely to apply if you or someone you know was injured or killed in a swimming pool accident.
Premises liability is applicable in cases where the injury stemmed from a defect on the property, specifically regarding the state of a pool or its safety features. However, negligence is applicable if the damage was caused by an action, whether neglectful or not. How do you interpret this personally? This implies that Texas has established specific criteria determining whether an individual is entitled to compensation for a fatality or injury sustained in such an accident. A swimming pool accident attorney may be of assistance.
Texans must follow several regulations to ensure the safety of all. You already know these regulations if you have a backyard swimming pool. As a pool owner, you will be obligated to provide the following:
Before installing or moving into a property with a pool, be sure to conduct a thorough investigation of the complete list of regulations.
Several inquiries must be pursued to ascertain the existence of a case. Before anything else, who owned the property? Further, what prompted the injured individual to be on the premises?
Several potential scenarios may emerge concerning the question of property control. As a social guest, was the injured individual present at the party for personal gain? Consider the scenario where you swam during the day, and a friend invited you to a barbecue. Alternatively, was the afflicted individual a business patronal invitee? This behavior is anticipated in any establishment where patrons utilize the pool, including public pools, water parks, and similar locations. Ultimately, concerning the unauthorized use of the pool, was the injured party a trespasser?
According to Texas law, the proprietor of a premises must maintain specific safety protocols during a visitor's vacation. Their primary duty is to ensure the safety and well-being of the visitor.
Let us individually examine each one:
A Licensee
People who come to the property for social reasons are called Licensees. Everyone was asked to a barbecue, including this person. When an owner "actually knows of an unsafe condition," they have to make it "reasonably safe" and "not injure the guest through willful, wanton, or grossly negligent conduct."
The property owner is in charge of keeping it "reasonably safe." These people must know about dangerous situations. You must prove that the owner must have known that the case was dangerous.
Furthermore, it would be best if you showed that there was an improbable danger of harm. This means you must show that the chance of injury was so high that a sensible person in the same or a similar situation would have seen it coming.
Invitees
For their advantage, invitees are individuals who gain access to the facility. This individual supports a business. In exchange for using the facility, they generally exchange money (their business). This category of consumers frequents public pools, amusement parks, and commercial establishments. The owner must safeguard you from hazardous conditions arising from their authority over the property in such circumstances. The owner is considered careless if they were aware, or should have been aware, that the condition presented an unreasonable risk of harm and failed to exercise the ordinary care of protection against the danger, warn the injured party reasonably, or ensure the situation was reasonably secure.
This indicates that it is reasonable for the property proprietor to ensure the facility is safe. Hazardous conditions must not be established on the premises. As an illustration, the proprietor of a waterpark is prohibited from excavating openings on the surface and permitting people to traverse them.
Furthermore, it is necessary to establish that they had constructive knowledge regarding the hazardous state. This indicates that they were liable to be aware of or knew about the condition.
An Intruder
Unauthorized individual entry onto private property constitutes trespassing. Whether they suspected they could use the property after discovering it or were committing a break-and-entrance. A trespasser is not obligated to be warned or assured of the safety of the property by the proprietor. An owner’s only obligation toward the trespasser is to exercise reasonable care for the trespasser's safety and refrain from intentionally causing damage.
The likelihood of having a viable legal case against the property owner where the injury occurred is low, given that the intruder's presence there without the owner’s consent rendered them liable.
Presumption liability applies, as stated previously, when the state of the property causes the injury. In contrast, standard negligence would apply if the actions of another person or a hazardous activity caused the damage.
Consider a scenario in which an employee at a waterpark behaved irresponsibly by simultaneously consuming alcohol and waiving you down the slide. Let us consider a scenario in which their conduct led to a collision due to the ambiguity of the fall. You cannot pursue compensation under Texas's premise liability laws despite the incident occurring in a swimming pool. As an alternative, you would seek compensation for typical negligence.
Damages, causation, duty, and transgression are all elements required to establish negligence. Specifically, let us examine each one:
Demonstrating that the waterpark employee had a responsibility to ensure the secure entry of slide riders is sufficient to establish the existence of a duty. His commitment was to diligently observe and provide the clarity of the pool situated at the base of the slide.
It would help if you established that the waterpark employee violated the duty to establish a breach. Being intoxicated and behaving irresponsibly, the waterpark employee violated his responsibility to ensure the safety of guests.
The cause must be established by demonstrating that the waterpark employee's negligent conduct caused the injuries. Patrons colliding at the base of the slide was precipitated by his imprudent behavior and the diversion caused by his intoxication.
Lastly, you must prove financial repercussions for the employee's conduct to establish damages. Hospital records, lost wages from time off work, or other evidence may be presented in support of this claim.
In summary, individuals who have sustained injuries in or on the premises of a pool ownership can pursue numerous avenues for recovery. You should consult with an attorney specializing in swimming pool accidents if you have any inquiries concerning the particulars of your case or the circumstances surrounding your damages. Contact us at (512) 777-0000 or via our form to initiate the process.
Mr. Shrum is a highly respected attorney who’s dealt with thousands of cases in and around Travis County. If you are in need of an attorney to help you face this unexpected situation think of Matthew’s Shrum Law Office.
If you have been injured due to someone else’s negligence or if you yourself have been charged with a crime, you need diligent legal defense. Choose The Law Office Of Matthew Shrum to partner with a trial attorney in Austin who’ll work vigorously to defend your rights at each stage of the legal process.
You have the right to seek compensation for the following in the event of negligence:
There are several potential routes of serious injury at or near a swimming pool:
Our personal injury attorneys have successfully represented injured clients throughout Texas for years. We have an extensive comprehension of how personal injury claims are managed in Texas and how courts in various regions of the state handle such claims. We understand the specifics of constructing a persuasive personal injury claim when expert testimony is necessary and which forms of evidence juries find most persuasive. We can expeditiously ascertain the value of your claim and assist you in obtaining complete and equitable compensation.
The Law Office of Matthew Shrum is a personal injury law firm located in Austin Texas. We serve all residents within Travis County, Williamson County, Hays County and Bastrop County.
© Copyright 2024 Matthew’s Shrum Law Office